A systematic review of Health Technology Assessment tools in sub-Saharan Africa: methodological issues and implications

Language
en
Document Type
Article
Issue Date
2014-12-17
Issue Year
2014
Authors
Kriza, Christine
Hanass-Hancock, Jill
Odame, Emmanuel Ankrah
Deghaye, Nicola
Aman, Rashid
Wahlster, Philip
Marin, Mayra
Gebe, Nicodemus
Akhwale, Willis
Wachsmuth, Isabelle
Editor
Abstract

Background Health technology assessment (HTA) is mostly used in the context of high- and middle-income countries. Many “resource-poor” settings, which have the greatest need for critical assessment of health technology, have a limited basis for making evidence-based choices. This can lead to inappropriate use of technologies, a problem that could be addressed by HTA that enables the efficient use of resources, which is especially crucial in such settings. There is a lack of clarity about which HTA tools should be used in these settings. This research aims to provide an overview of proposed HTA tools for “resource-poor” settings with a specific focus on sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). Methodology A systematic review was conducted using basic steps from the PRISMA guidelines. Studies that described HTA tools applicable for “resource-limited” settings were identified and critically appraised. Only papers published between 2003 and 2013 were included. The identified tools were assessed according to a checklist with methodological criteria. Results Six appropriate tools that are applicable in the SSA setting and cover methodological robustness and ease of use were included in the review. Several tools fulfil these criteria, such as the KNOW ESSENTIALS tool, Mini-HTA tool, and Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis but their application in the SSA context remains limited. The WHO CHOICE method is a standardized decision making tool for choosing interventions but is limited to their cost-effectiveness. Most evaluation of health technology in SSA focuses on priority setting. There is a lack of HTA tools that can be used for the systematic assessment of technology in the SSA context. Conclusions An appropriate HTA tool for “resource-constrained” settings, and especially SSA, should address all important criteria of decision making. By combining the two most promising tools, KNOW ESSENTIALS and Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, appropriate analysis of evidence with a robust and flexible methodology could be applied for the SSA setting.

Journal Title
Health Research Policy and Systems
Volume
12
Citation

Health Research Policy and Systems 12 (2014): S. 66-78. http://www.health-policy-systems.com/content/12/1/66

DOI